sum-up of Antarctic activities in 2023

2023 is soon drawing to close and it is time to look back to the year of Antarctic activities as well. It is probably right to say that the less is published on the blog, the more is going on, as all the energy goes to the world outside the www.

 

In May and early June this year, I had the honour to participate in the Estonian delegation to the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) held in Helsinki. From the same month I serve also as the Estonian contact point to the Antarctic Treaty.

Antarctic Treaty meetings are prime scientific diplomacy, so researchers have also been present at its diplomatic meetings, but it was a pleasure to see Estonia re-emerge at the ATCMs and signal that we are still committed to and interested in rules-based international order and environmental protection of the Antarctic environment. One of the important messages that Helsinki ATCM tried to signal was the urgency of climate change in Antarctica and the fact that what happens in Antarctica impacts the entire world, and it felt good to see that much of the research that we have been doing is relevant this global diplomatic system. Also, after all these years of going through tens and thousands of documents from and about the ATCMs in all imaginable archives around the globe, it felt really nice to see this system in action.

 

Climate Change and Cultural Heritage in Antarctica, XXV Science Afternoon of the U.S. Embassy in Estonia and the Estonian Academy of Sciences "Polar Research in Estonia" held on September 20, 2023

Estonia is a non-consultative member of the Antarctic Treaty, but has not ratified the Environmental Protocol yet. To draw attention to the polar research in Estonia and remind the decision-makers of the necessity to join the Environmental Protocol in order to be able to partake in the decision-making in Antarctica, the Estonian Academy of Sciences and the Embassy of United States of America in Estonia organised XXV Science Afternoon,"Polar Research in Estonia" on September 20, 2023.

You should be able to come to my talk by clicking on the picture. Polar science is by its nature big science, requiring big infrastructure and big money - things that Estonia does not have much of. Transition from being a part of Soviet Union’s Antarctic program with bottomless resources and from the optimistic economic growth of the early 2000s has not been painless. In short-term project-based international science where most of Estonian scientists need to work with time-limited grants in other countries’ programs to be able to do Antarctic science, it is hard to foster the next generation of Antarctic scientists and to even say where Estonian Antarctic science ends and others’ starts. None of my work would have been possible without the scholars in Argentina and Sweden whom I work with. However, conscious efforts in fostering a new generation is something that the Polar Research Committee of the Estonian Academy of Sciences will need to work with in the coming years.

Presenting the role of environmental NGOs in Antarctic mineral negotiations at the SCAR Standing Committee on Antarctic Humanities and Social Sciences (SC-HASS) conference in Lisbon as well as the European Society of Environmental History biannual conference in Bern almost feel like non-events in this line but were very giving. Another talk that gave me a lot of joy was a presentation in Swedish at the S A Andrées Polardagar at Grenna Museum and Polar Centre. It is not that often I get to speak to the Swedish audience outside the university and it feels good to give back to the people whose taxes have financed my research for many years. On the request of the tireless Håkan Joriksson who runs the museum and the polar days, I spoke on the past, present and future of the Antarctic Treaty to a very passionate crowd of Antarctic aficionados.

Participating at the KTH digital teaching conference

Last year was teaching heavy. Digital teaching heavy. And more so than normal.

This week KTH held a conference on digital learning with the pandemics in focus. Great keynotes and hand-on tips were very welcome to everybody who’s been trying to make sense of the jungle of new digital tools emerging on the market. The Division of History decided to make their contribution: Siegfried Evens organised a session where me, Katarina Larsen, Siegfried himself and Per Högselius summed up the takeaway points from our two biggest courses, Energy Systems in Society and Swedish Society.

Achim Klüppelberg has summed up the discussions on the Division blog.

Presenting in "Petersburg" today: Polar readings 2020

Together with Tayana Arkachaa, I will be presenting “Who Wants the krill “Schnitzel”? Researching and Using Krill in Soviet Union and Japan” at the Polar Readings conference today. The conference was supposed to take place in St Petersburg between May 18-21, and was now taken online. Alas, the duration of the talk was reduced from 20 to 10 minutes together with the digitalisation of the conference, so Tayana gets to do the speaking in Russian. The conference is also streamed on YouTube, through the next three days. Tayana and I will present today at 13.00 Moscow time.

The contents we can cover in such a short time will inevitably be very limited but it has nevertheless served me to dig into my krill materials. The title alludes in fact to the Polish campaign of developing krill schnitzel, whereas nothing so spectacular was ever produced in the Soviet Union or Japan. However, looking closer at the numbers of krill fishing, I was struck again by the deeply ingrained racism in the discourse around Antarctica. From time to time, articles like this warn us against Russian and yellow peril in Antarctica. What is typical of texts like this, is that they mix Arctic and Antarctic in swift discursive turns and seldom have any good data about the countries that they suspect of wanting to take over Antarctica for resource extraction. I’m not saying that China or Russia are NOT interested in natural resources in the Antarctic. However, I don’t think they are interested in resources any MORE than all the other states of the Antarctic Treaty. No country has gone down there to simply enjoy an icy landscape. Yet, we never read articles of what is Norway up to in Antarctica, whereas it is the country that fishes up most krill. If Russia essentially stopped krill fishing after the fall of the Soviet Union and Japan stopped krilling in 2012, then Norway’s krill fishing has been on increase year after year. In 2018/2019, Norway fished 245 014 tons of krill, compared to the 2nd biggest krill fisher, China, who came home with 50 423 tons - five times less. Yet, articles like the one linked above, keep asking about Chinese interest in marine resources of the Antarctic. And yes, Russian colleagues at the conference have just confirmed that the Arctic scientific program of this year had to be downsized because they cannot get their people out. But Norway, what is Norway up to? Not having looked into the Norwegian materials closer, i can only guess that the culprit is the nice and pink salmon on your lunch plate - krill is an excellent feed in aquaculture, particularly for red meet fish, because krill makes their muscles even pinker.